I normally try to refrain from talking about the Red Sox stuff here since I know most of you could care less, but I just couldn’t hold back on this one. When I saw the All-Star roster I was pretty upset with the omission of Hideki Okajima. I mean this guy has been absolutely lights out! But I wanted to make sure that my bias wasn’t clouding my objectivity so I decided to look at the stats of the others relievers who were chosen to see if there is anyone who was less deserving than Mr. Okajima (even Jonathan Papelbon).
The four relievers who were selected were J.J. Putz, Bobby Jenks, Francisco Rodriguez, and Papelbon. After methodically examining all of their stats, along with those of Okajima, it looks like a case could be made for the Red Sox lefty over Jenks or Rodriguez.
Okajima | Jenks | Rodriguez | |
IP | 40 | 32 | 35 |
H | 22 | 25 | 27 |
HR | 1 | 1 | 2 |
R | 4 | 10 | 9 |
BB | 10 | 10 | 14 |
SO | 36 | 29 | 49 |
ERA | 0.9 | 2.76 | 2.27 |
WHIP | 0.8 | 1.071 | 1.171429 |
K/9 | 8.1 | 7.99 | 12.36 |
BB/9 | 2.25 | 2.76 | 3.53 |
AVG | 0.163 | 0.213 | 0.187 |
Okajima has an advantage over the other two in every category except strikeouts. So why did he get left off the list? Obviously sometimes get left off in favor of players who are the only representative for their team. That leaves out Jenks since he is the lone selection from the lowly White Sox whose hitters couldn’t hit themselves out of a wet paper bag and their pitchers have been anywhere from mediocre to dismal.
Maybe some more thoughts about the All-Star game later.
3 Comments:
As you admit, Jenks shouldn't be part of this question .. as for K-Rod, you make a convincing case for Okajima but you can't leave out a guy like Rodriguez who's on the best team in the league, is leading the AL is saves, and has a proven track record. Relievers are tough to judge, they go on streaks where they're unhittable, then come back to earth .. see Wickman last year compared to this year. I think if Okajima sustains this throughout the rest of the year and through the first half next year .. he'll be there. For this all-start game, I think you have to (and Leyland has)take into account the fact that the hitters don't know him yet and he's still benefiting from the fact that hitters aren't used to him.
If his success continues, when his newness wears off, then he'll be there.
You're right about Jenks being a questionable all-star but we needed someone. In my opinion, Buehrle or Garland should have both made it over Jenks. By the way Log, could you talk to Papelbon for me? He still owes me $1,300 dollars. Thanks.
I mean this guy has been absolutely lights out!
Post a Comment